Search for: "Sheridan v Sheridan" Results 181 - 200 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2016, 6:28 am
Supreme Court established the legal standard for these claims in its landmark 2010 decision in Jones v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:20 am
Feb 28, 2008) (NO. 2919)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Desiree Sheridan of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:30 am
("Whether the excluded portion of Sheridan's testimony is admissible absent the district court's Rule 16 sanction is an issue that may arise again should a new trial be required on remand, and we therefore address it here"); Resolution Trust Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Second, there is the case of Curran v Scottish Daily Record ([2010] ScotCS CSHOH 44) in which temporary judge Morag Wise QC dismissed an action arising out of an interview given by Mr Tommy Sheridan MSP in which he criticised the pursuer, another MSP and other individuals in the Scottish Socialist Party, referring to them as “political scabs”. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:34 am by WSLL
Sentence vacated and remanded.Case Name: DHARMINDER VIR SEN v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
They pick up on their previous comments about whether section 9(3) CDPA on computer-generated works operates as an exception to the originality requirement, especially in light of the E&W Court of Appeal decision in THJ Systems v Sheridan. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:00 pm by Maria Giagilitsis
On December 3, 2010, Ontario arbitrators released a decision in Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  First, when a judge makes a finding that someone is not reporting all of their income and not paying taxes on it, pursuant to a case called Sheridan v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]