Search for: "Smith and Nephew, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2014, 9:44 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Smith and Nephew R3 Smith and Nephew Implants have not been recalled, except for a limited number of R3 models and a number of lawsuits nationwide have been filed against Smith and Nephew. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2013 WL 6504427, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:25 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Smith and Nephew R3 Smith and Nephew Implants have not been recalled, except for a limited number of R3 models and a number of lawsuits nationwide have been filed against Smith and Nephew. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 10:59 am
Practice Tip: Since September 2012, Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC, an entity believed to be related to Bonutti Research, Inc., has initiated a series of patent-infringement lawsuits against medical-device manufacturers, including Depuy, Inc.; Zimmer, Inc.; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; Wright Medical Group, Inc.; ConforMIS, Inc.; Arthrex, Inc.; Linvatec Corporation; ConMed Corporation and Biomet, Inc. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
A related prior dispute between Convatec and Smith & Nephew involving nonsilverised versions of their respective products, Aquacel and Durafiber, and relating to a different patent, was reported by the IPKat here, and the appeal decision upholding the first instance judgement can be read on BAILII.But let us return to the current case Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc & Anor No 2 [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat) (12 December 2013). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 13 C 1850, slip op. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 9:54 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 1:13 CV 1220, 2013 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:43 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Smith & Nephew, Inc. 13-290Issue: Whether a defendant may be held liable under the “willful blindness” standard where its actions were consistent with an understanding of relevant legal requirements that was not objectively unreasonable. [read post]