Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration" Results 181 - 200 of 751
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  But as a City administrator testified, agencies may target their outreach efforts in particular communities only if they serve “all members of the City of Philadelphia. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
In the U.S., the commercial producers are well on their way to replacing general practitioners. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) Smith & Nephew Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:57 am by David Oxenford and Adam Sandler
  (Docket 20-145 Comments) Broadcasters and other media groups submitted their reply brief in National Association of Broadcasters, et al. v. [read post]
We are increasingly aware that as the courts begin to reopen, there are many opportunities to treat represented and unrepresented parties differently, and to put this down to general administrative overload and/or lack of supportive technologies. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am by Mark Rienzi
That general agreement on first principles may explain why the court already has several significant religious liberty cases on its docket for next term. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
 Freedom of contract remains the general rule. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Smith and hold that any substantial burden on religion should trigger strict scrutiny under the First Amendment. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:43 pm by Scott McKeown
  For example, “the Secretary’s power to remove a judge from federal service under the generally applicable efficiency-of-the service standard, in conjunction with the Director’s power to prescribe the rules and policies judges must follow, enables those superiors to ensure that judges faithfully apply those rules and policies in cases before them. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts explains that Secretary Duke was "bound by the Attorney General's legal determination" concerning Texas v. [read post]