Search for: "Spirit Track v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
By Mike Dorf No doubt many casual observers were stunned by the fact that today's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Perhaps the best-known application of this thesis involves the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:29 pm
We’ll also make some spirited (and sure to be wrong!) [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 9:29 am
§ 2259, and you can find earlier postings on this blog regarding these cases here.In United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am
v=43f2bBjGi_8 Now, that’s quite a quirky repertory, and it stands in favorable comparison to Tom’s: the periodic table, plagiarism, pollution, the new math, the Vatican II conference, and of course the silent letter ‘e’. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
(TTABlog) SDNY: STOLICHNAYA case ends again: Federal Treasury Enter. v Spirits Int’l (Property, intangible) Reversing a 2(e)(2) geographical descriptiveness refusal, TTAB asks, where the heck is WINDHOEK? [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
As it stands, the only real factual assertion in the article isn’t looking good.Earlier this month, the Department for Communities and Local Government published a consultation on a fast-track mandatory power of possession. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
As it stands, the only real factual assertion in the article isn’t looking good.Earlier this month, the Department for Communities and Local Government published a consultation on a fast-track mandatory power of possession. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:23 pm
However, our Circuit has interpreted Robertson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
” We honor a life that was lived to the full, we honor a spirit, now free. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Braun Melsungen AG, et. al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:21 pm
” [1] Zubulake v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
In a sense, that’s not terribly surprising, since Judge David Hamilton had previously taken the same track (if less explicitly) in his previous opinion while still on a district court judge in Hofts v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm
Lyle has diligently tracked the progress of the challenge to California’s “Proposition 8” law, Perry v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
Ted Gup started tracking down the descendants of the letter writers. [read post]
