Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Civil Cases"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
The standard for meeting the burden of proof to overturn a jury verdict is certainly different from the notice pleading requirements of California law. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Same decision instruction in this case. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 11:02 am
The injured woman argued that the deviation from current building codes was evidence of common negligence, and that the trial court should have allowed this evidence and instructed the jury accordingly. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 11:23 am
Fred Lewis wrote letters requesting that the Florida Supreme Court Committees for Standard Jury Instructions in Civil and Criminal Cases consider “the problem of jurors engaging in electronic communications, research or the use of technology by jurors during a pending case. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:25 am
The Connecticut Civil Jury Instruction on this issue reads as follows: In advising a client concerning settlement, the attorney must exercise that degree of learning and skill which the average and ordinarily prudent attorney in that line of practice in Connecticut would apply under all the relevant circumstances. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 pm
In this case and during the jury-instruction conference, the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict, which the trial court denied. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 9:19 am
Op. at 19, asthe jury was instructed. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:12 am
" The clear and convincing standard is the highest burden of proof known to civil law. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:11 am
” “This case, like Williams, appears to eschew the strict criminal standard of willfulness that the IRS has for years applied to the civil FBAR penalty,” said Jim Mastracchio, Co-Chair of the firm’s Tax Controversy Practice. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:36 am
The following blog entry is written to illustrate a common motion filed during civil litigation. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
These appeals involve the subsequent petitions filed by Letitia James, as Public Advocate for the City of New York (hereinafter the Public Advocate), the Legal Aid Society, the New York Civil Liberties Union, and [branches of the NAACP], . . . to unseal and release the grand jury minutes to themselves and to the general public, including transcripts of testimony, exhibits, information about certain grand jurors, and legal instructions. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 11:27 pm
In those cases where the process takes a little longer, there is the benefit of having a better jury for the case. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
(Published in Pennsylvania Law Weekly Monday, December 28, 2009)A Wild RideA multitude of landmark decisions in civil law make 2009 a year to rememberBY DANIEL E. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Perhaps the prosecutors didn't present their case well enough, perhaps the police did not gather enough evidence, or perhaps the jurors were not well-instructed on the law. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:15 pm
Here are some of the latest orders on motions for summary judgment in civil rights cases under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
In Rattigan, a jury found that the FBI violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by referring the plaintiff, a black FBI agent then employed in Saudi Arabia, for a security investigation in retaliation for the plaintiff’s filing an internal anti-discrimination complaint. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
At trial, the court instructed the jury that it was enough for the U.S. to show the defendant failed to disclose the AKS violation. [read post]
28 May 2013, 10:53 am
In a case like this one, international human rights standards can help inform our courts in interpreting the duty that is owed to victims and survivors. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
He argued that the respondent was wrong to instruct the jury to apply the civil standard of proof when considering whether James Maughan had committed suicide. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
That is the case here [read post]
