Search for: "State Court of Clayton County"
Results 181 - 200
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2021, 11:00 pm
He defends cases in justice, municipal, state, and federal courts in and near Maricopa County. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 11:58 am
Clayton County and who has instructed the applicable federal agencies to do the same.Contrary to a trending hashtag on social media and the polemics of a few loud voices, President Biden most certainly did not “erase women” — whatever that means. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:47 am
Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), the Supreme Court held that Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of . . . sex” covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:30 am
Clayton County and enforce Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of . . . sex,” to cover discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 12:24 pm
Clayton County impact employment law? [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 6:59 am
Clayton County, Georgia, which held that Title VII prohibits discrimination against gay or transgender employees as a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 5:51 am
Clayton County said that that form of discrimination is form of sex discrimination. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
(Please note that these filing figures represent federal court filings only; the figures do not include separate state court class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:24 am
Clayton County, the court also observed that discrimination based on one’s sexual orientation or gender identity was not possible without discriminating against the person based on their “sex. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 3:00 pm
Clayton County, Georgia held that the provision of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act which prohibits discrimination in employment "because of sex" protects gay, lesbian and transgender individuals.(4) The Supreme Court in Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 7:30 am
Republicans targeted Clayton County, which is 72.8% Black. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 3:24 pm
Clayton County, in which the Court ruled that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects LGBTQ employees, who were not specifically protected by the text of the law. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Garry, When Anti-Establishment Becomes Exclusion: The Supreme Court's Opinion in American Legion v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:43 pm
Clayton County — which held on textualist grounds that a federal employment discrimination law applies to LGBTQ employees — the heirs stress that nothing in the FSIA’s expropriation exception limits U.S. courts’ jurisdiction based on the citizenship of the victim. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:31 am
Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
Clayton County, RFRA was explicitly named as the “super statute” tool to dismantle Title VII’s protections for LGBTQ employees, as I discussed here.It’s not that members of Congress in 2000 didn’t understand that Title VII was being targeted by RFRA. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Clayton County Georgia, Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Clayton County Georgia, Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
Clayton County, concluding that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and transgender status. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
On this reading, the Court’s racial discrimination mean “not merely that race was important but that the burden on the people who are rejected because of race is an interest that the state could seek to protect, that a rejection on the basis of race or any protected category creates a st [read post]
