Search for: "State v Harrington" Results 181 - 200 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2015, 1:53 pm by Jon Sands
The court applied the AEDPA limitation on relief as described in Harrington v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am by Steve Vladeck
Second, and in any event, the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Harrington v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm by Jon Sands
  Judge Kozinski disagreed with this reading of the PCR order, and argued that under Harrington v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:42 pm by Stephen Page
Neither is it open for anyone to do so either: Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11, at 72, per Heydon, Crennan, Bell JJ; and indeed, had the transcript been different than the transcript provided by the official transcriber, it would constitute a serious offence as an officer of the court. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Jon Ibanez
The United States Supreme Court recently unanimously held in Riley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am by Rory Little
” But this argument can’t be entirely discounted, given the Court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:57 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Warger v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:43 am by Matt Danzer
James Pohl starts Wednesday’s brief session begins with a summary of where things stand in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:04 am by Stephen Page
It is actual reliance by the promisee, and the state of affairs so created, which answers the concern that equitable estoppel not be allowed to outflank Jorden v Money by dispensing with the need for consideration if a promise is to be enforceable as a contract. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:18 am
This odyssey of a criminal prosecution began back on July 8, 2009, when the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York issued a press release announcing SIX CHARGED IN $140 MILLION INVESTMENT FRAUD AND STOCK MANIPULATION SCHEME. [read post]