Search for: "State v. Berger" Results 181 - 200 of 593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
Article Fifth states that Klein “hereby transfers and conveys” to Klein “all his interest in [the LLC], where he owns 50%. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Berger, Is State Neutrality Bad for Indigenous Religious Freedom? [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Berger’s claim that the 14th Amendment was not understood at the time to establish a principle of racial equality is pretty clearly correct, even if some of Berger’s specific arguments are flawed. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:27 am by SHG
As the Supreme Court famously said in Berger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
Kat friend Tyrone Berger reports on a recent case in Australia that addresses the ever-vexing quetion of when use amounts to trade mark use.In the recent decision of Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Ltd, the Australian Federal Court has found that the name given to a style of bikini will not amount to 'use as a trademark' so as to consitute trade mark use. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
In his seminal work calling executive privilege a “constitutional myth,” Raoul Berger wrote that when “seeking to ascertain the boundaries between the conflicting claims of Congress and the President, questions of practical convenience need to be separated from the issue of constitutional power. [read post]
Berger also looks at Madison’s notes of the Constitutional Convention and records of the state ratification conventions to determine how the Framers and ratifiers viewed the term. [read post]