Search for: "State v. C. A."
Results 181 - 200
of 39,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); ME and others v Refugee Applications Comr and another (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); (Joined Cases C-411/10 and C-493/10); [2011] WLR (D) 388 “European Union law precluded the application of a conclusive presumption that the member state responsible for examining an asylum claim pursuant to… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:27 am
" Sansone v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:49 am
Citing language from the obstruction of justice provision, USSG § 2J1.2, dicta in its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm
C. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 4:02 am
LEXIS 684 (August 18, 2010): With respect to Rule 41(c), in State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:01 am
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:54 am
HOHENLOHE, Petitioiners and Appellees, v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm
+ come(v.). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:28 pm
To begin a state specific search, choose the first letter of the state you would like to search:A C D F G H I K L M N O P R S T U V W Whether you are a government zoning official determining other city zoning regulations, a developer researching available land, or a concerned citizen investigating government issues, GovScan is here to help. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
R (Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Case C-388/07); [2009] WLR(D) 82 “National rules allowing compulsory dismissal at retirement age and non-recruitment of persons of retirement age were not contrary to Community law provided that they were justified by legitimate social [...] [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 2:04 am
Allianz SpA and another v West Tankers Inc (Case C-185/07); [2009] WLR (D) 44 “It was incompatible with Regulation 44/2001 for a court of an EC member state to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings before the courts of another member state on the ground that such proceedings would be [...] [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
But A's case is not a judgment in C's case; A's remedy is not a remedy for C (see, e.g., Gill v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:51 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an important judgment in Case C-58/08 Vodafone and Others v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:51 am
A case called State v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:54 am
Migrationsverket v Kastrati and Others (Case C-620/10); [2012] WLR (D) 139 “The withdrawal of an asylum application which occurred before the requested member state had agreed to take charge of the asylum seeker, had the effect that Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 which established the criteria and mechanisms for determining the member state responsible for examining an asylum application would no longer be applicable. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
Class representatives and their counsel in the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation have won another initial round in their suit alleging that Chinese vitamin C manufacturers conspired to fix prices and to limit the output of vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
