Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 181 - 200 of 13,650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
       (c)  The responsible development and use of AI require a commitment to supporting American workers. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am by Jacob Wirz
[6] Brief of Amici Curiae State of West Virginia and 26 Other States in Support of Petitioners, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
” The Second Amendment returns to the Supreme Court Less than two years after their landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:55 am by Etienne Farnoux
Sara Tonolo (Università degli Studi di Padova) and deals with Les actes de naissance étrangers devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme – à propos de l’affaire Valdís Fjölnisdóttir et autres c/ Islande (Foreign birth certificates before the European Court of Human Rights – about the Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others v/ Iceland case). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct)  lcb11@psu.edu     Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
 In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:00 pm by gA
Sus dos hits fueron "Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States" (1833) y el "Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws (1834)" que siempre cita Vélez en las notas al Código.COMPLETANDO EL TOP 5Digresión aquí para decir que de aquí para abajo no podemos hablar de influencers en la Corte. [read post]