Search for: "State v. CC" Results 181 - 200 of 1,542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 11:45 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The respondent's attack against inventive step made for the first time with its response to the grounds of appeal, starting from D3 and combining this with the general knowledge of a skilled person was also indicated as likely to be held inadmissible under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007.V. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:29 pm by Lisa Ellefsen
The court in Spring Forest Trading CC v Wilberry (Pty) Ltd t/a Ecowash and Another held that if there is intention for the data to constitute a signature, and such data is attached to or logically connected with other data, then it would amount to an electronic signature. [read post]
3 May 2020, 10:48 am by Giles Peaker
(Oxford CC’s) argument is, in my view, misconceived. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:01 am by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
 However, Hungarian engineers Gábor Domokos and Péter Várkonyi proved such assumption was wrong by creating the Gömböc: the first known 3D homogenous object with only two equilibrium points (one stable and one unstable) which always returns to its initial position on a horizontal surface. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Cas. 603, 604 (No. 6,742) (CC Mass. 1846) (Woodbury, J., for the court). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am by Dennis Crouch
” Yet the dissent, despite the Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of such review in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 10:07 am by Giles Peaker
Hertfordshire CC had brought possession proceedings in 2015. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Steven Boutwell
  Businesses with greater than 500 employees and businesses for which the SBA Size Standards are stated in terms of annual receipts (without regard for the number of employee), may be eligible for a PPP loan if they qualify as a “small business concern” under existing law. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
  That submission was inconsistent with the House of Lords decision in Ali v Birmingham CC (2009) UKHL 36 (and other authorities), in which it was said that Birmingham were not entitled to leave homeless families in their current accommodation indefinitely: “What is suitable for occupation in the short term may not be suitable for occupation in the medium term, and what is suitable for occupation in the medium term may not be suitable for occupation in the longer… [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
  That submission was inconsistent with the House of Lords decision in Ali v Birmingham CC (2009) UKHL 36 (and other authorities), in which it was said that Birmingham were not entitled to leave homeless families in their current accommodation indefinitely: “What is suitable for occupation in the short term may not be suitable for occupation in the medium term, and what is suitable for occupation in the medium term may not be suitable for occupation in the longer… [read post]