Search for: "State v. David Harding"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:11 am
" Kappos further stated that "first-action allowance is up something like 600%" under this pilot program. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
At the Los Angeles Times, David Savage observes that the case was the first separation-of-church-and-state case to come before the Court since the confirmation of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, General Electric v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
Problem 14 --David Schultz, The State of Democracy in North Dakota --Notes and Questions -- Shaun Bowler When Is It OK to Limit Direct Democracy C. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 12:46 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Bolling v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:39 am
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In its 1989 decision in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:38 am
Soc. for Testing Materials v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 pm
The Telegraph had campaigned hard for this, and the Carnegie UK Trust had championed this idea before the House of Lords Communications Committee. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:58 am
That was the only question and that’s not a hard one. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 4:30 am
In their article, David L. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:09 am
David Siders has this post at the SacBee. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
In terms of Supreme Court decisions, especially the CLS v Alice Bank decision, David said that it is impossible to make sense of the Supreme Court jurisprudence on section 101. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm
(Ilya Somin) The Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case of Fisher v. [read post]
