Search for: "State v. Ege"
Results 181 - 200
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2008, 4:39 am
We are getting dangerously close to the famous ACLU v Reno No 1 case which asserted that , even in the interests of children, the whole of the Internet should not be reduced to the level of a "children's reading room".Putting the job of censorship on to ISPs, host and SNSs rather than directly exercised by the state, does not make it any less censorship - it just makes it less transparent and less accountable. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 7:41 am
" Owen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
It's chock full of analysis of the Bebchuk v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
(iv) The ECHR is concerned to guarantee rights that are practical and effective, not theoretical or illusory (see See eg Von Hannover v Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [71]). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
(For eg: See part 3 here, and any of the posts here) I am not going into them for now. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 6:55 pm
That no longer seems to be the case (eg here). [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
The procedural safeguards available to the individual will be especially material in determining whether the respondent State has, when fixing the regulatory framework, remained within its margin of appreciation. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 4:36 pm
Most big cases (eg, Ariad v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:23 pm
Opinion on SGAE v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Private copying levy systems are not harmonised in the EU, and some Member States do not even collect levies or decided to get rid of them altogether. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
WEINSTEIN, PINSON & RILEY, P.S., EVAN MOSCOV, and EGS FINANCIAL CARE, INC., formerly known as NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.No. 14 C 739.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
Voting served in part to ensure rewarding those who remained at least officially aligned with the core ideology (eg it is difficult for a socialist to win an election in the United States at least for the moment given the nature of US underlying ideologies of democracy and its ties to forms of economic organization). [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 4:49 am
In R v R the judge stated she would not make an occupation order, but went on to prohibit the Respondent from entering the street and from communicating at all with the Applicant. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 6:44 am
On 26 April 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its long-awaited judgment in Poland v European Parliament and Council (C-401/19). [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:49 pm
California law generally prohibits an employer from making deductions from an employee’s wages except as required by state and federal law for certain withholdings (eg. taxes) or as authorized by the employee for medical/health benefits or pension plan contributions. [read post]
