Search for: "State v. Flowers  "
Results 181 - 200
of 581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2018, 2:58 pm
; The next case on their docket on the issue – Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:34 am
In other words, it seems to grate against the concept of reciprocity and harmonisation which is a stated objective of the Bill.Fourthly, the Bill proposes that ministerial consent first be obtained before an application for gTLD can be made. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:40 am
Mason v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:12 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 19/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:19 am
This week's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:07 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 6/7/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Harpur Trust v… [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 6/7/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Harpur Trust v… [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 29/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
The Court stated that as described in Conolly v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:25 pm
Flowers, Michigan's Supreme Court concluded that, in order to satisfy constitutional requirements, the notice method utilized had to be "reasonably certain to inform those affected. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 1:34 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June… [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:08 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June… [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
(The justices considered a request to reconsider their cert denial in a similar case, Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm
SWAMMI, INC. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
” A new world was dawning in the United States as well, King said, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Jake Warner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 2:04 pm
The issue in Flowers v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 1:59 pm
The case is Spittler v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 1:59 pm
The case is Spittler v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:09 am
Next Thursday, November 5, the seven justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court will sit at the bench behind me to hear the criminal case of State v. [read post]
