Search for: "State v. Grounds"
Results 181 - 200
of 40,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 7:00 am
The decision covers a lot of ground, but here are some highlights. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:18 pm
Dairy Export Council et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am
It lost for two reasons: one grounded in contract law and the other external. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:39 am
Callais and Landry v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:19 am
See Weinberger v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:07 pm
" Williams v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
" To that end, I've got a new paper, forthcoming in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, defending Dobbs on originalist grounds. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:10 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
In Bissonnette v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
In concrete terms, for example, this means that ifin a given context climate action requires the creation of a “common ground” betweenpublic and private actors, the result will be a “public-private” co-production of the publicgood. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
In most states, a lawyer may share court-awarded fees with a nonprofit organization that employed, retained or recommended the lawyer’s employment. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"A mere conflict in opinion among physicians is not a ground for disturbing a determination" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d at 848 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"A mere conflict in opinion among physicians is not a ground for disturbing a determination" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d at 848 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]