Search for: "State v. Hicks #1"
Results 181 - 200
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2022, 6:22 pm
Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 515 (1993). [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:41 am
He states that he is raising a claim based on Hicks v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
George Hicks (Kirkland) is counsel of record on the other side. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
(reprinted with permission from Lyle Denniston Law News) The argument in Dollar General v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
1. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
§ 157(b)(1).III. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
In the case pending before the 3rd Circuit, a group of Division 1 student athletes from several states filed a lawsuit in the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
A-1 Contractor, Nevada v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am
In R v Legal Aid Board, ex p Kaim Todner ([1999] QB 966), the Court stated that it was important not to forget why proceedings need to be held under the full glare of a public hearing because there was a natural tendency for the general principle to be eroded. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
” United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
Hicks) -- filed May 13, 2010. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
A new Florida state court decision, State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
Every oversight action pending in the House that involves a former official—including, for example, the Judiciary Committee’s past subpoenas to Hicks and Annie Donaldson, former deputy counsel, as well as its recent subpoena to former White House official Rick Dearborn—could potentially be reset to a new default. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court… [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
” Hicks Slip op. at 15. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm
Hicks. [read post]
