Search for: "State v. Lambert" Results 181 - 200 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2007, 8:58 am
The Supreme Court recently granted a petition for certiorari to review a Second Circuit decision holding that the FDA approval process does not preempt certain state common law claims.The Second Circuit decision, Desiano v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
While this moggy was struggling to get back from Indonesia, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the pregabalin appeal Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 October 2016), and finally the IPKat has managed to blog about it (the lateness by no means reflecting on the importance of the judgment).It is very much a judgment of three halves.In the first part of the judgment (up to [135]), which substantively… [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:04 pm
See: In Re Gabapentin Patent Litigation (involving Warner-Lambert, Pfizer and Godecke Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Lambert, which involves the timeliness of an appeal from a denial of class-action certification. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The EBA’s decision states that the two approaches give the same result and referred to various national cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 1:56 pm
The solution was suggested to me by the State's brief and its reliance on Slack v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:13 pm by Amy Howe
Lambert (Tuesday, Nov. 27): Whether equitable exceptions apply to mandatory claim-processing rules and therefore excuse a failure to timely file within the deadline set by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
 The patent belongs Warner-Lambert, a company that was acquired by Pfizer in 2000. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]