Search for: "State v. Milite"
Results 181 - 200
of 793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2013, 11:12 am
v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm
Is dissatisfaction with the current state of Section 2 jurisprudence a good enough reason to warrant application of Section 5? [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:19 am
Harry Graver summarized the briefs and oral arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Matthew Kahn flagged the government’s motion to limine in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Circuit’s decision in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 11:18 am
In Vassalle v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:02 am
, Stokes v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 6:09 am
Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am
Quinta examined whether the Justice Department just admitted doubts over Trump’s oath in its brief on appeal in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:34 am
United States, 510 U.S. 163 (1994), which is “whether the factors militating in favor of [the proposed rule] are so extraordinarily weighty as to overcome the balance struck by Congress. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Several considerations militated in favor of allowing plaintiff to proceed with a medical monitoring claim, said the court. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:41 am
He highlighted the four great themes of the first day’s efforts: Globalization v anti globalizationTrade v investmentGovernancePredictionHe then asked: How to move forward? [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
The other, more significant, event was the decision by the European Court of Human Rights in Austin v UK. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm
Bobby considered how the detention of Umm Sayyaf may serve as a prototype for future captures of Islamic State militants. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:14 pm
Now, not only has the evidence that Sebesta suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:04 pm
Moreover, as discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeals held in the Luther v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:38 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
