Search for: "State v. Personnel Housing" Results 181 - 200 of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am by Wells C. Bennett
His recruiter mentioned that, by virtue of that status, the Taliban could give Suleiman a house and a wife. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by John Bellinger
This approach was not adopted on the basis that Article V tribunals are required only in cases of “doubt” whether a person qualifies as a prisoner of war; because detainees could not qualify as prisoners of war, there was no reason to have Article V tribunals. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
  The answer according to the United States Supreme Court in Feres v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:18 pm by PJ Blount
In addition to the Co-Chairs, the Task Force shall consist of the following members: (i) the Secretary of Defense; (ii) the Secretary of Labor; (iii) the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; (iv) the Secretary of Transportation; (v) the Secretary of Education; (vi) the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers; (vii) the Director of the Office of Management and Budget; (viii) the Administrator of the Small Business Administration; (ix) the Director of National Intelligence;… [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]