Search for: "State v. Pope" Results 181 - 200 of 534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In the United States, the doctrine was enshrined in the famous property rights case of Johnson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:33 pm
This auto-crash was investigated by the Missouri State Highway Patrol with the assistance of Sergeant V. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
The AP is reporting that Sandra Day O'Connor criticized the tradition, maintained in about two dozen states, of judicial elections. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
”  Pope John Paul II After The Home Secretary’s extraordinary performance on Andrew Marr this morning where she set out her cunning plan to bring out guidelines for the judges in relation to the interpretation of Article 8 of The European Convention – enshrined in our law by The Human Rights Act – the sardonic side of my temperament would like to substitute the word ‘government’ in the quote above for ‘freedom’. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm by Simon Lester
Continuing with my occasional (although becoming somewhat frequent) posts on NAFTA Chapter 11 non-discrimination standards, there is a new decision to talk about: Merrill & Ring v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:34 am
"The relevant CBA specifically stated that no permanent employee "may be disciplined without just cause" and set forth a detailed, four-step grievance procedure for resolving disputes. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Following a statement from the Secretariat of State warning against unauthorised use and misuse of the image of Pope Francis, the Secretariat of State has hired a well-known law firm to monitor and repress any unauthorised third-party uses of the image of His Holiness. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Pope, 200 P.3d 977, 1001 (Ariz. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to petitioners' contention, however, the petition fails to state a cause of action for fraud or constructive fraud against either HSBC or respondent law firm because it fails to make a "factually supported allegation" of misrepresentation (Pope v Saget, 29 AD3d 437, 441, lv denied 8 NY3d 803; see Simmons v Washing Equip. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
  While the Pope was visiting Washington, DC, the Kentucky Supreme Court reversed a multi-million dollar punitive damages award in Nissan Motor Co., Ltd v. [read post]