Search for: "State v. Rand" Results 181 - 200 of 479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
These facts are sufficient to state a claim for promissory estoppel.* Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 6:00 pm by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the court granted in part and denied in part the employer’s petition to deny enforcement of an NLRB order; correspondingly, it denied in part and granted in part the NLRB’s cross-application for enforcement (Dresser-Rand Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:32 am by Joy Waltemath
And the union did not make a showing of irreparable harm: While a recent Rand Corporation study indicated that body cameras are associated with increased assaults against police, other studies have reached different conclusions (Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Even the Supreme Court prefers to treat Bush v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm by Edward DeLisle and Maria Panichelli
The Economic Loss Rule and the Ability to Sue Design Professionals without a Contract A recent Maryland case, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 1:50 pm by JB
Republicans now control the vast majority of elected offices in the states. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm by David Strifling
Rands, 389 U.S. 121, 123 (1967). [5] Sturgeon v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 6:37 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Senators say fixes to disability insurance not enough, January 28, 2016, The Hill More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 6:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Rand Paul Tells Seniors He Would Change Social Security, January 5, 2016, TIME, By Philip Elliot More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]