Search for: "State v. Richmond" Results 181 - 200 of 1,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 9:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
While the Supreme Court professes to follow the tiered scrutiny doctrine set out in cases such as Washington v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
LenhardtJudicial Opinions as Racial Narratives: The Story of Richmond v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:50 am
Yet civil rights attorneys rigidly fought such annexations until the Court, in City of Richmond v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Topics include “Poll tax litigations and campaign information; Richmond Crusade For Voters literature and training materials; Prince Hall Fraternal Order of Black Freemasonry documents; Massive Resistance and the Byrd Machine; Interstate Highway System family displacement records; [and] Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:06 am by Amanda Frost
  The question for the Court in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Tamiz (Aka Miah) & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2638 (12 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RH v South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1273 (12 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) BJM v Nathan Eyre & Ors [2010] EWHC 2856 (QB) (12 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Abbassi & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:41 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Dixon, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2163 (05 October 2012) Ferriter, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2211 (03 October 2012) Matthews, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2154 (27 September 2012) Williamson, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2114 (02 August 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whiston, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1374 (25 October 2012) Davies & Ors v Secretary of… [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:31 pm by Olivia Cross
By: Hyung Gyu (Leo) Sun Sun is an Associate at Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig’s Richmond Office. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by Hillary Frommer
For example the Appellate Division has held that the fact that a decedent registered to vote in a particular state does not mean that the decedent made that state his or her domicile (see Laufer v Hauge, 140 AD2d 671 [2d Dept 1988]; Matter of Estate of Gadway, 133 AD2d 83 [3d Dept 1987]). [read post]