Search for: "State v. Robert S." Results 181 - 200 of 18,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Lawrence Solum
The following spring, Roberts joined the majority in upholding Washington States minimum wage statute. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
On October 23, 1987, the United States Senate held one of the most-controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in its history, when it rejected Robert Bork’s appointment. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:53 am by John Wileur
  Bork’s views have influenced the Supreme Court in a number of milestone judgments (e.g., Continental Television v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm by lennyesq
BY MARK JOSEPH STERN The Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Allen v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:04 pm
Chief Justice Roberts published a dissent from denial of certiorari today in a Fourth Amendment case, Virginia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:47 am by Jason Rantanen
  Opinion here: Oil States v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:55 am by Steve
In Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:43 am by Ramos Law Firm
The Supreme Court of the United States released their opinion on Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor joined Justice Kennedy’s opinion. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The persistent problem of the constitutional balance between the Executive and Judicial branches is personalized as a struggle between "two intellectual gladiators" with their "Coliseum" as the Supreme Court of the United States in an article in today's "Week in... [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:51 pm by The Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether a state violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by amending its own state constitution to prohibit race- and sex-based discrimination or preferential treatment in public-university admissions decisions. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm by Eric Segall
This shift reflects the Roberts Court's belief that local and state governments must lower the wall of separation whether they want to or not. [read post]