Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 181 - 200
of 21,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2013, 11:19 am
Sullivan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a groundbreaking ruling denying first sale protection to resellers of digital music. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:58 am
The issue in Helsinn v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:23 am
In the Arizona Supreme Court's Vazquez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:37 pm
NOT CHARGED – Possession of Dangerous Drugs for Sale, State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 1:21 pm
Palacios v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:48 am
Texas already collects sales tax from many larger remote sellers who have a physical presence in the state, but in the wake of South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:51 am
The court’s decision in Oracle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The decision interpreted the first-sale doctrine, which allows legal owners to resell, lend, or dispose of copyrighted works after purchase, to apply only to works manufactured in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The decision interpreted the first-sale doctrine, which allows legal owners to resell, lend, or dispose of copyrighted works after purchase, to apply only to works manufactured in the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
In Watkins v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
Vesely v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 11:14 am
Adobe Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:26 am
In Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:26 am
In Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:45 pm
In Edible IP, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:06 am
Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:01 pm
James Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an opinion granting summary judgment for the defendant in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]