Search for: "State v. Stewart/Billings"
Results 181 - 200
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Jane announced that the Fourth Circuit affirmed the 2012 refusal to vacate the sentence in the United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
Trump and Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
Scott Harman summarized the proceedings in Doe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:27 pm
In re Stewart, 175 F.3d 796 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 1997). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Servs. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Launch of Westlaw UK Insight, online encyclopaedia of law Professor Stewart Purvis’ round up of the Newsnight sagas NUJ: Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture: Newcastle 2012 [video] In the Courts On 11 December 2012 judgment was handed down in the privacy case Price v Powell & Ors [2012] EWHC 3527 (QB). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
KF 4496 I7 K57 2011 New beginnings : constitutionalism and democracy in modern Ireland Bill Kissane. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
blog discusses the Draft IP Bill and data retention obligations, arguing that the invalidation of the Data Retention Directive has not brought a better future. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Stewart Baker provided the latest edition of the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast in which Jason Healey of the Atlantic Council and Columbia University and the Steptoe gang debate whether the Internet is really worth it. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Incorporation – the application of the Bill of Rights to the states – was a Warren Court success story. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm
The new chief, Ran Baratz, has previously “suggested President Obama was anti-Semitic and compared Secretary of State John Kerry’s ‘mental age’ to that of a preteen. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 12:49 pm
This morning, I was preparing for class with a new case that I had assigned, Perlin v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
The Bill promises to introduce a stronger test for courts to consider before they can order journalists to disclose their sources. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
s digital lock rules (Michael Geist) ‘When copyright Bill C-32 passes, I will automatically become a criminal’ – digital locks (Michael Geist) Business method patents: The state of the art after the Amazon.com decision (IP Osgoode) Chile Heroic victory for action figures – dispute over transformers.cl (IP tango) Europe CJEU considers ‘logistical hub’ for fakes in Nokia hearing: C-495/09 (Class 46) (IPKat) (Afro-IP) EFF calls on European… [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am
He also took a look at how the "bill revives the EMP Commission (the 'Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack'), which previously had a run from 2001 to 2008. [read post]
