Search for: "State v. Taylor E."
Results 181 - 200
of 719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
In the Journal of Law and Education last year, Aaron Taylor reviewed data from 16,000 law student respondents to Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) to demonstrate how the notion of merit, as increasingly defined by Law School Admission Test (LSAT) scores, ensure that scholarships actually result in being directed to those with the most privileged backgrounds, with a notable racial element to them. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
By the evening, Rose stated that Mikayla “felt like she was on fire,” although she did not have a thermometer to measure her temperature due to the move. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
*Addressing Plaintiff's argument that her Article 78 was timely under the "continuous wrong doctrine," the Appellate Division, citing Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, indicated that the continuing wrong doctrine "may only be predicated on continuing unlawful acts and not on the continuing effects of earlier unlawful conduct. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
*Addressing Plaintiff's argument that her Article 78 was timely under the "continuous wrong doctrine," the Appellate Division, citing Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, indicated that the continuing wrong doctrine "may only be predicated on continuing unlawful acts and not on the continuing effects of earlier unlawful conduct. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 10:43 am
Buddy up with your friendly state public defender, and start fishing for transcripts of plea deals illustrating the broad use of Taylor-contested state statutes. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
The full judgment of Andrew Hochauser QC in the data protection subject access case of Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP [2019] EWHC 1258 (Ch) [pdf] handed down on 17 May 2019. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
As it argues, “[e]ven if the President has not yet asserted a particular privilege, excluding agency counsel would diminish the President’s ability to decide whether a privilege should be asserted. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 11:59 am
” Under the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
§924(e)). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:22 am
Way back in 1990, the Supreme Court decided Taylor v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
” The Data Protection Report notes that Nevada, New York and other states are following California’s CCPA. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:04 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:23 am
Taylor v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:49 am
" United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:31 am
Taylor. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Taylor v. [read post]
