Search for: "State v. Z. A. B." Results 181 - 200 of 418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U    Division A — Greco   2nd   20   B, F, P    Division B — Myers   1st Floor   12   D, M, N, X, Y    Division C — Farr   2nd   24   C, K, R    Division D — Lefler   2nd   23   H, L, W    Division E — Taylor   2nd   22   A, E, J,… [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:20 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  CFPB examiners concluded that one or more institutions had a weak compliance management system that allowed violations of Regulations V, X, and Z to occur, such as weak oversight of automated systems, including inadequate testing of codes that calculate the finance charge and amount financed when originating mortgage loans. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:06 am by INFORRM
The dissenting judges find that “the selectivity and off-handedness of the majority’s employment of the Court’s case-law manifests itself again” when the majority in Fürst-Pfeifer fails to reference cases like Z v Finland and Armonienė v Lithuania, on the disclosure of persons’ HIV status. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
As the Seventh Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
Il commence ainsi un duel judiciaire, dans lequel ce qui compte ne sont pas les faits, mais leur interprétation et lacapacité des deux avocats.Ce sera la justicequi gagnera ou bine l'habileté dans la manipulation des évènements? [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm by familoo
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
At all times material, defendant Foss Maritime Company (Foss) was a corporation doing business in the Southern Division of the Western District of Washington, was the owner and operator of the tug JUSTINE FOSS and Barge Z Big 1, and employed plaintiff as a member of the crew of the tug JUSTINE FOSS. 3. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Next up: V is for Veterans’ Benefits Under the Tax Code, income is reportable and taxable unless otherwise excluded. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm by Sean Hanover
The following are excluded from expungement in DC: (9) "Ineligible misdemeanor" means: (A) Interpersonal violence as defined in § 16‑1001(6)(B), intimate partner violence as defined in § 16‑1001(7), and intrafamily violence as defined in § 16‑1001(9). [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
Having just reversed itself in the face of an en banc rehearing in Garcia v. [read post]