Search for: "Staten v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
Sokoloff v Harriman Estates Development Corp., supra. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Blum v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Blum v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am
The maximum damages allowed under U.S. copyright law of $150,000 could potentially be awarded for each track infringed, and as Grooveshark has been accused of infringing nearly 5,000 tracks in the lawsuit - that's a massive $736 million (UMG Recording Inc et al v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court held in Mistretta v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 4:20 pm
Indeed, they suggest that the Supreme Court’s recent antitrust ruling in NCAA v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:08 pm
(See, e.g., People v Freeland, 36 NY2d 518, 525 [1975].) [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:34 pm
In Sass v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:05 am
As classic writers already recognized, states may take offensive action even while waging a defensive war (see Bluntschli, Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staten, § 521). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
See, e.g., Theer v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
I don't know what it means for a claim to "occur" in the Bronx, or Staten Island, or Long Island. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 6:47 am
While the historic 1999 Supreme Court decision Olmstead v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 10:53 am
As also is evident, this case is indistinguishable from People v Zanghi. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am
According to the Second Department, therefore, Section 608 gives the estate of a deceased member standing to pursue a dissolution claim, despite the language in Section 702 stating that only a member can petition for dissolution. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
