Search for: "Support FF" Results 181 - 200 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
The plaintiff conceded at oral argument that that amount — the difference between what Kaiser obtained by reimbursement and what it would have obtained under FFS guidelines — was likely greater than $5 million. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by admin
Foundos of FFS, the Carlyle owners are seeking to use the auction to goose the marketplace enough to establish a clearing price — a base from which they hope and expect to move upwards once they can announce Sold at $XXX,000 apiece! [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:06 am by FDABlog HPM
   FDC Act § 201(ff) specifically states that a dietary supplement is a food, with certain exceptions not applicable here. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Eric E. Johnson
Law §349 et ff. as per the Terms and Conditions) PLAINTIFF AND THE CLASSES v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:07 pm
Does your dietary supplement make illegal disease claims or authorized structure/function claims? [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
It seems that a deposit made pursuant to 37 CFR 1.801 ff may not be in full compliance with the rules. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by admin
  If so, the creditors will be compelled, however reluctantly, to keep the MFI on life support. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
Congress returned to DC on Monday 11/15/2010 to begin a "lame duck" session . [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The board however can find no evidence to support this point of view. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:42 am by David Harlow
  As we move forward into the realm of bundled payments and quality incentives (Massachusetts is getting there first), capping FFS inflation is just not where we ought to be focusing our energies. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm by Anita Anand
While this study may appear to bolster his argument, the La Porta study does not support Lortie’s argument as will be discussed. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:53 am by Jack Goldsmith
 Curtis Bradley and I once argued (2123 ff.) for Pildes’s option (2), but Pildes’s combined approach may be better. [read post]