Search for: "Tax Analysis v. Irs" Results 181 - 200 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
In his study on family taxation, Bittker concluded that the ideal treatment of joint and single  filers comes down to one’s assumptions about how the code should acknowledge the role of marriage and the family as a recognizable social, financial, and legal entity.[5] Avoiding the thornier questions of how the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ought to evaluate marriage as a societal entity and parse income-earning members in a family,[6] if one accepts that married filers are simply… [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
Based on this evidence, in May 2004, the Army invited the IRS to `join the investigation’ of IPM and American Boiler and gave copies of the imaged hard drives to the IRS so it could conduct its own review and analysis. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:04 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
Further, submissions won’t qualify under the New Procedures, if the taxpayer is under an IRS examination, civil or criminal, or if the IRS finds that the entities were used for tax evasion. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm
Some background on the Textron challenge to the IRS workpapers summons: The  district court case, United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:40 pm by Samuel Bray
The statutory analysis in Part I begins with a paragraph about "the problem" of post-Civil War injunctions against tax collection. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Key Findings Massachusetts’ tax advantage in New England is primarily driven by its competitive individual income tax rate and its sales and use tax structure. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
Paul Caron reached a similar conclusion through a similar analysis in Tax Consequences of Kidney Donations.So what Kerry proposes won't fly. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The penalty spelled out in the new health care law uses those very words: it is to be collected by IRS just as any other tax penalty is. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Fifth, might the Congress repeal section 107, the existence of which is difficult to justify under any sort of tax policy analysis? [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
The case that started this controversy was Amos v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(b) Such an analysis suggests that the shared responsibility payment may for constitutional purposes be considered a tax. [read post]