Search for: "Time, Inc. v. TIME INC."
Results 181 - 200
of 40,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
So far, there is little express authority confirming that the holding in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 11:07 am
Topolewski immediately reapplied for the mark, but this time, through Metal Jeans. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 2:08 am
The decision by the court of appeals, which comes at the behest of a Texas metal-working company also bearing the Galperti name, is the second time in the same dispute that the trademark agency has been reversed by the Federal Circuit (Galperti, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:49 am
Best Buy Co., Inc., March 9, 2023, per curiam). [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:36 am
In Alonzo, a federal district court granted summary judgment in favor of our client MAXIMUS, Inc. on the plaintiffs’ time rounding claims. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:40 pm
Public Storage, Inc., Sup. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:44 am
In Dominus/Cityzen Brampton SWQRP Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. questions that law when an employer can track employee clock times to the minute. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. questions that law when an employer can track employee clock times to the minute. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. questions that law when an employer can track employee clock times to the minute. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. questions that law when an employer can track employee clock times to the minute. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. questions that law when an employer can track employee clock times to the minute. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. questions that law when an employer can track employee clock times to the minute. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 7:22 am
" InVue Security Products Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:49 pm
We are currently waiting CVSG amicus briefs in two patent cases pending before the Supreme Court: American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Anyone that has been monitoring the outcome of district court cases recently will be aware of the perils of not including sufficient information, or not timely supplementing, preliminary infringement or invalidity contentions required by many local patent rules. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Recorded phone call between party and copyright agent regarding image timing confidential at prelitigation phase Nature of Case: copyright dispute Electronic Data Involved: phone call recording Keywords: protective order, confidential phone call, work-product Identified State Rule(s): FRBC Rule 4-4.1, 4-1.2 Identified Federal Rule(s): 26(b)(3), 37(a)(5) View Case Opinion [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
MioMed Orthopaedics Inc., MioMed failed in another arbitration case, this time in California. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:13 pm
Lojack Corporation, Inc., 578 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2009), and issued a new opinion, Rutti v. [read post]
