Search for: "Toyota v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Toyota Industrial Equipment, 714 A.2d 1043, 1047-48 (Pa. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
" You learn something new every day.Robert Brauneis and Anke Moerland's recent article argues that it would not be good policy to allow the company that distributes siggi's ® yogurt to trademark the name SKYR for yogurt in the United States, even though most people in the United States do not currently know what the word "skyr" means. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v Theatre Mayo Clinic Company (Afro-IP)   Thailand Thailand to join PCT Treaty (The IP Factor)   United Kingdom UK IP minister hopeful of ‘significant progress’ on Community patent and court (IAM) EWHC: Woolworths woolly IP agreements don’t hold value: Butters & Ors v BBC Worldwide & Ors (IP finance) If you liked the Rule, you’ll love the Practice… [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
’ (PatLit) PCC Update 1: new regime, new judge, old case, old rules: Technical Fibre Products Ltd & Anor v Bell & Ors (PatLit) Formula 1 fight for right to race as Nelumbo Nucifera (IPKat) Summary judgment, but no quick fix on costs: Patents County Court decision in Nike International Ltd & Ors v Bateman (IP finance) United States US Patents USPTO announces launch of second peer to patent pilot program (Inovia IP) (IP Watch) (IP: KCE)… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist)     Australia I thought cats were colour blind... [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:56 am by Randal L. Gainer
As Bruce Schneier points out, “attackers can just as easily build a botnet out of IoT devices from Asia as from the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:56 am by Randal L. Gainer
As Bruce Schneier points out, “attackers can just as easily build a botnet out of IoT devices from Asia as from the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner)   Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office)   Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46)   South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s) Tavern… [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
: Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group & Ors (PatLit) Nude trademark battle between Stella McCartney and Nude Skincare heads for Chancery Division (IPKat) NZ tribes find Everton Football Club’s misappropriation of Haka culturally insensitive (1709 Copyright Blog) Pirate Party UK officially registered (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) Save £10 on your patenting costs - Trade Marks and Trade Marks and Patents (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2009 (IPKat) Patents County Court:… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]