Search for: "U. S. v. Holder" Results 181 - 200 of 559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2018, 3:03 am by Peter Mahler
Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], involving the same Delaware LLC at issue in the Estate of Calderwood case (#6 above), in which the trial court held that the holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, nonetheless identified in the operating agreement as a “Management Member,” was entitled to inspect the LLC’s books and records. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
The Nation’s unauthorized use of the undisseminated manuscript had not merely the incidental effect but the intended purpose of supplanting the copyright holders’ commercially valuable right of first publication. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am by Keith Mallinson
Getting the Asian authorities also to reverse their positions in IP policy, for example, on antitrust enforcement, is a daunting task.US U-turnsIn a major reversal to the stance of Renate Hesse, the former head of the DoJ’s Antitrust Division, her successor Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Makan Delrahim really hit the nail on the head in his speech at the USC Gould School of Law's Center for Transnational Law and Business Conference in Los Angeles on… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Take the recent case of Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich was called upon to decide whether the plaintiff holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, identified as a “Management Member” in a 65-page operating agreement (plus another 170 pages of schedules and exhibits), was a… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Take the recent case of Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich was called upon to decide whether the plaintiff holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, identified as a “Management Member” in a 65-page operating agreement (plus another 170 pages of schedules and exhibits), was a… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Remaking the DMCA in such a way would shift almost the entire burden and cost of enforcement from copyright holders to OSPs. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Remaking the DMCA in such a way would shift almost the entire burden and cost of enforcement from copyright holders to OSPs. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
A licensed public insurance adjuster is expressly prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the reconstruction, repair, or restoration of damaged property that is the subject of a claim adjusted by the license holder; acting as a public insurance adjuster and a contractor on the same claim is a statutorily-defined conflict of interest. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
A licensed public insurance adjuster is expressly prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the reconstruction, repair, or restoration of damaged property that is the subject of a claim adjusted by the license holder; acting as a public insurance adjuster and a contractor on the same claim is a statutorily-defined conflict of interest. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
An interesting set-up, indeed, for a decision last week by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla in Golder v 29 West 27th Street Associates, LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 31527(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 17, 2017], in which she denied a motion to dismiss the dissolution petition upon finding “a material issue of fact exists as to whether a written operating agreement exists as to the LLC’s term of duration. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:13 am
The NIT relayed Pawlak's IP address and other information back to the FBI in the Eastern District of Virginia.Based on this information, the FBI issued a subpoena to AT & T, the Internet service provider connected with Pawlak's IP address, and learned that Pawlak's wife was the account holder associated with the address. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
The copyright holder sent a “takedown notice” to YouTube, which then removed the video. [read post]