Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Although the Court is not deciding today whether SPP can prevail on this claim, the Court concludes that SPP has included sufficient facts to provide notice to District 211 of a plausible claim under the IRFRA. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 6:41 am
Below, Martine Cicconi of Stanford Law School recaps Wednesday’s ruling in Conkright v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:36 pm
District Court found that the agency had the authority to issue the rule. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:14 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California has extended the TRO mandating Kaiser to "treat" Israel Stinson until May 11. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm
” There are, by contrast, fewer than seven hundred authorized federal district court judgeships. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 12:58 am
Anderson Community Schools faced a lawsuit on its school uniform policy. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:10 am
The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act: All states and the District of Columbia have enacted a statute called the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, which sets standards for when a court may make a custody determination and when a court must defer to an existing determination from another state. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:02 pm
District Court granted the City's motion for summary judgment, effectively ending the case (although Ko may appeal). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:12 pm
Yesterday a Marblehead, Massachusetts man was arraigned on Child Pornography Charges in the Lynn District Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:08 am
...Although it arises in the context of federal joinder, this court agrees with the Seventh Circuit that Form 13 provides a good indication of what one must plead in a fraudulent conveyance claim under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act to satisfy the purposes of Rule 9(b). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
Holdings/Conclusion: We find no error in the district court’s rulings, and we therefore affirm. [read post]
11 May 2018, 11:24 am
” This standard differs from the Phillips standard used by district courts. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:51 am
It reversed the decisions of the bankruptcy court and the district court and held that the federal rule of common law, rather than state law, would be used in interpreting 11 USC 550(d) which bars a trustee from taking more than a "single satisfaction" on account of the same avoided transfer.The Court reasoned that a uniform rule of federal law was preferable because the rule of single satisfaction concerned the… [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:07 pm
A 35-year old police woman was appointed to the uniformed force of the New York Police District in 1991 and, during the course of her career, ascended to the rank of sergeant. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:07 pm
A 35-year old police woman was appointed to the uniformed force of the New York Police District in 1991 and, during the course of her career, ascended to the rank of sergeant. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
Tennessee Code Annotated § 16-2-511 provides: Uniform rules of practice may be promulgated in each district by the judges of the district. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
Delving into "one of the darkest corners of antitrust law," the federal District Court for the Northern District of California recently determined what standard – the per se rule or the rule of reason – should apply to judge the setting of prices by members of a joint venture. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:48 pm
Focusing on federal admiralty law, which governed the case, and its fundamental principle of uniformity, the court determined that a shipowner's nonliability for the acts of an on-board physician was a matter of settled maritime law that the district court could not upset, particularly where only one other decision espoused a contrary view at the time the district court made its decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Given this, it might make good sense to read “becomes effective by June 30” in light of the separate requirement in the Illinois Constitution (entitled “Effective Dates of Laws”) that the General Assembly “provide by law for a uniform effective date for laws passed prior to June 1 of a calendar year,” but permitting the legislature to adopt variations from the uniform requirement in particular laws passed before June 1. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. in the case General Electric Company v. [read post]
