Search for: "US v. Brock" Results 181 - 200 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
State, 315 So.2d 487 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), Brock v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  The third's a little hard to research, so we'll use a proxy for the allowing of negligence concerns in strict liability, which is whether a plaintiff’s comparative fault/negligence reduces the verdict or at some level becomes a complete defense.Here's what we've found:AlabamaAlabama follows its own peculiar form of strict liability called the “Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:40 am by J
Brock v Wollams [1949] 2 KB 388 and, more recently, Fitzpatrick v Stirling HA Ltd [2001] 1 AC 27 were clear authority for the generous approach to be taken when construing that phrase. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:40 am by J
Brock v Wollams [1949] 2 KB 388 and, more recently, Fitzpatrick v Stirling HA Ltd [2001] 1 AC 27 were clear authority for the generous approach to be taken when construing that phrase. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm by legalinformatics
The advent of relatively cheap printing in the 19th Century, and its application to legal opinions after the decision in Wheaton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
The Stanley Works (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Failure to allege lack of substantial noninfringing use sinks contributory infringement claim: Clayton v. [read post]