Search for: "US v. Diaz"
Results 181 - 200
of 862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2019, 5:34 pm
Two weeks ago I wrote about Diaz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:18 pm
That's what the Fifth District Court of Appeals held last month in the case of Diaz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:54 am
In 2009 in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:32 am
Call us at 561-625-8400. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:28 pm
(The Meineke case referenced is Broussard v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:55 am
Last week United States District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:55 am
Last week United States District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
” Later, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
Diaz, No. 1:09-CR-0037-WBH, 2011 WL 344093, at *1 (Jan. 31, 2011) (quoting Fed. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 8:56 am
The case, Caperton v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:15 am
It took me awhile to track down the transcript of oral arguments from Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:08 am
That is precisely what has happened to the employer in a case entitled Diaz v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
") AC32608 - State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
Diaz (2011) 51 Cal.4th 84 (Diaz), we held that, incident to a custodial arrest, police may search through data on a defendant’s cellular phone without obtaining a warrant. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
The Supreme Court has taken a case a year on this question, starting with Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
