Search for: "US v. Spears" Results 181 - 200 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am by Ben
The Court of Appeal endorsed the decision of Ravenscoft v Herbert and New English Library Ltd [1980] RPC 193, where there was a finding of copyright infringement by the author of a novel who took a substantial part of a historical work, The Spear of Destiny. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:32 am
It's not yet available on BAILII, but the decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in the latest episode of JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Another v Zynga, Inc [2013] EWHC 3348 (Ch) (on which see earlier Katposts here and here) is well worth a read. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
Before anyone else emails the IPKat to let him know, he can tell you that he is fully aware of the two big trade mark rulings from the Court of Appeal for England and Wales last Friday in Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. v Cadbury UK Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1174 and JW Spear & Son Ltd, Mattel Inc and Mattel UK Ltd v Zynga Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 1175 and he will be providing separate Katposts on them in the fullness of time. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
 Long history of it.Plus, to me, if you're a caveman and are out to hunt (or defend yourself against) an animal, you probably use a spear or a bow. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Again http://t.co/y0unOiUO3M -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-07-06: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-28: Com… http://t.co/68wn0271oo -> Crass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension — Rosario v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The number in parens is the number of times I've used the tag. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Tejinder Singh
That gets us through the decisions. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Spears , in which the Court held that the federal Drivers’ Privacy Protection Act prohibits the use of protected data from state drivers’ databases to solicit clients, comes from Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST and Walter Olson at Cato At Liberty, who notes that the majority in the case is the polar opposite of the majority in Maryland v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:56 am by John Steele
Overlawyered has more discussion of the case we mentioned yesterday dealing with a statute that protects the privacy of drivers' data but does provide an exception for litigation uses of that data. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm by David Kemp
”Read more: Supreme Court says pre-Miranda silence can be used by prosecutors in courtMaracich v. [read post]