Search for: "United States Marine, Inc. v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 566
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
In a thorough and well-reasoned opinion, the Florida Supreme Court concluded that the statute violated the United States and Florida constitutions. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
In a thorough and scholary opinion, the Florida Supreme Court concluded that the statute violated the United States and Florida constitutions. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
Mariner Health decision. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Mariner Health, 994 So. 2d 1051 (Fla., 2008). [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Keeto, Inc., 463 So. 2d 368, 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (quoting Neylon v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Keeto, Inc., 463 So. 2d 368, 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (quoting Neylon v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am
” Another potential consequence would be ISIS turning to “less conventional military tactics” and inspiring attacks elsewhere including Europe and the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 9:56 am
A recent case from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal explains how pre-existing injuries can complicate claims for maintenance and cure. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:24 am
Background Our law firm represents a United States credentialed merchant mariner who was the nominal employee of a security services company named American Guard Services. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm
One need only reflect on the fact that more than 1,000 qui tam actions for false marking were filed by opportunistic plaintiffs following the 2009 Federal Circuit decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
See State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
See State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:37 am
United States District Court for the WesternDistrict of Texas, 134 S. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
440.34 violate the injured workers' rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:54 pm
A frequently asked question in our practice is, can an acronym register at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) and be protected as a federal trademark? [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:58 pm
and Trinity Marine Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 pm
Karasik EEOC v. [read post]
