Search for: "United States v. American Employers Insurance Co."
Results 181 - 200
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
Supreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite Costs Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
The insurance company appealed this decision. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Sun Life and Health Insurance Company v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm
Recognized in Who’s Who In American Professionals and both an American Bar Association (ABA) and a State Bar of Texas Fellow, Ms. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
March 27, 2013) and American Express v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Steel Mining Co., LLC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm
The case was remanded for further proceedings.Read More: Appeals court rules Oklahoma license plate suit has meritUnited States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
March 27, 2013) and American Express v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:09 am
The following day, in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Co. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But in Coleman v. [read post]
