Search for: "United States v. American Sales Corporation" Results 181 - 200 of 715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Chris Skelton
Specific concerns may arise for LGBTQ+ foreign nationals seeking to come to the United States, or for LGBTQ+ service members in the U.S. armed forces. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 6:01 pm
The survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive(R) in September and October 2007 among a nationwide cross section of 1,509 adults (age 18 or older), with annual incomes of $150,000 or above (if employed), at least $500,000 of investable assets (unless retired) or at least $1 million of investable assets (if retired). [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:47 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
(“Penguin”), a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York City, sued American Buddha, a not-for-profit corporation with its principal place of business in Arizona, for copyright infringement in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:50 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
(“Penguin”), a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York City, sued American Buddha, a not-for-profit corporation with its principal place of business in Arizona, for copyright infringement in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
The Schwarzenegger case, in which California is defending the constitutionality of a law prohibiting the sale of violent video games to minors, will address some of the same issues as United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am by My name
Take for example the lack of backlash against Barilla and Chik-Fil-A here in the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm by K&L Gates
  Spir maintained separate accounts, and title to products purchased by Spir passed to Limited in Europe before ever reaching the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
”Not only could the state legitimately regulate sales of securities, proponents argued; it should. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:51 pm by Peter Spiro
Unlike American citizens, foreign individuals, governments, and associations are unlikely to have allegiance to the United States. [read post]