Search for: "United States v. Appling"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2012, 5:58 am
Given Apple's victory, it is likely that Apple will continue to press its offensive throughout the globe, particularly in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
But they still haven't put the U.S. part of the dispute behind them.Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard Samsung's appeal of the district court ruling in the first Apple v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon, United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am
The most valuable one of Apple's three software patents-in-suit in the first case (most of the damages there relate to design patents, not software patents), the '915 pinch-to-zoom API patent, has meanwhile been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Apple had to file an appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 10:20 am
Less than ten hours later, Apple scored another win over the Google subsidiary: the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit just denied a motion by Motorola Mobility for a rehearing. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:50 pm
On November 18, 2013 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived Apple's bid for a permanent patent injunction against Samsung's Android-based devices with respect to three multitouch software patents (rubber-banding, tap-to-zoom-and-navigate, and pinch-to-zoom API), while affirming Judge Lucy Koh's denial of injunctive relief with respect to the asserted design patents. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 1:38 am
Apple is now trying to get help from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, and requested an emergency hearing before the end of the week, while Ericsson wanted to firstly complete fact discovery (the deadline is on Friday, July 15). [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:25 am
Yesterday (Monday) was Day 5 of the FTC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm
"Three weeks ago, Apple and Samsung agreed to withdraw all litigation pending between them outside the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In the Apple v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:29 am
I learned it over the years watching those Apple v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 8:35 am
" In the same footnote, Nokia explains that one can deduce from the findings of fact and conclusions of law in FTC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:28 am
Apple judgment says.The consolation prize that is the Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:24 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713, this Court upheld the press’ right to publish information of great public concern obtained from documents stolen by a third party. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:35 am
But a tipping point may have been reached at which conservation will come to an end even in her district court.A few days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's motion to stay issuance of a mandate (pending a Supreme Court petition) following a recent appellate ruling on the first California Apple v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:03 am
Apple says that damages-only retrials, such as in Uniloc v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:52 am
Case date: 11 September 2020 Case number: No. 19-2190-cv Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:03 am
Grewal, who assists Judge Koh in the two Apple v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:53 pm
Five months after Judge Posner canceled an Apple v. [read post]
