Search for: "United States v. Colon" Results 181 - 200 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:25 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
About a month ago, the Sixth Circuit issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am by Schachtman
Cuyler Hammond, and Herbert Seidman, “Mortality Experience of Insulation Workers in the United States and Canada, 1943-1976,” 330 Ann. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Gelman
Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm by Mark Zamora
The cancers from which these patients suffered included cancers of the breast, lung, colon rectum, prostate, pancreas, ovary, skin (malignant melanoma), and brain. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:01 am
At issue is the drug Erbitux (cetuximab), made by Lilly's ImClone unit. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Siegel, 1986 Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3101:9, at 4; Rep No. 95 of Comm on State Legis, Bill Jacket, L 1985, ch 294 at 16). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by Viking
This was an issue that the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida did not need to address in its recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm by Paul McGreal
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]