Search for: "United States v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF I. & N."
Results 181 - 200
of 349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2014, 6:16 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm
§ 1332(a)(2) (granting the district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions between “citizen of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state”). [5] See, e.g., V’Guara Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
., United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:01 pm
On Friday, I wrote about my amicus brief supporting the cert petition in DOT v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
But how should the Supreme Court of the United States resolve that question? [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Perhaps a set of basic governance devices as models would serve a useful purpose as well.In any case, this has been a long time coming in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:12 am
Brown v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
Still, I hope you enjoy. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 11:01 am
Bedell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
State, 714 So.2d 479, 481 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
”Bob” DeSousa, State Director for U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
I taught the course for the first time in the Fall 2010 term, following the initial syllabus I prepared. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
Anne returned to the United States on February 15, 2011. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
`Now I can tweet whatever I want and I hope one of y'all m*ther f*ck*rs snitch on me’ 4. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
