Search for: "United States v. Essential Construction Co., Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
See Old Town Canoe Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
This should be the end of the story and this was supported in Genetech Inc’s Patent [1989] RPC 147. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Essentially, this reexamination was pursued to leverage the perceived change in obviousness standards caused KSR International Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Some of the relevant publications were Safety Review, starting in 1944, United States Navy Medicine, The Naval Medical Bulletin, and United States Navy Medical News Letter. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
JSM Construction could satisfy these conditions by paying a in-lieu fee, dedicating on-site affordable housing units in each of the projects, constructing off-site affordable housing units, or acquiring land for affordable housing. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]