Search for: "United States v. Lang" Results 181 - 200 of 336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2015, 12:14 pm by Georgialee Lang
Not so in the United States where Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Martha Stewart and others faced charges, not for steroid use or securities fraud, but for lying. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:15 pm by Georgialee Lang
I guess I’ve been lucky because I have never had to do a trial where the opposing party acted in person, “pro se”, as they call it in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States A Washington D.C based band is suing YouTube, after the website removed its music video. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
 The Nazis invoked cultural arguments, explicitly or implicitly to reject “Jewish” science; religious groups in the United States invoke religious and political considerations to place creationism on an equal or superior footing with evolution; anti-vaccine advocacy groups embrace case reports over rigorous epidemiologic analyses. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Since that time, the CAFC issued an unsatisfying divided opinion, and then last week, the Supreme Court of the United States finally decided the issue. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:30 am by Scott A. McKeown
CLS Bank was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States this past Monday. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Would this be an appropriate case for a defence of parody or, in the United States, fair use (and could the facts be forced to fit within the scope of "fair dealing" or any other defences under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988)? [read post]