Search for: "United States v. Tam"
Results 181 - 200
of 916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 1:15 am
In a June 16 decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:50 am
The Court upheld these provisions because it determined that the United State’s interest in protecting the integrity of a qui tam fraud investigation was compelling, and that the sealing provisions necessarily protected that interest and were narrowly tailored toward that end. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:09 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:51 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
See(2)(A) You Later: Supreme Court Holds that DOJ Has Broad Dismissal Authority Even After Unsealing
21 Jun 2023, 9:59 am
Supreme Court, in United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 11:19 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:50 am
The lawsuit is titled United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
The positions in this brief are somewhat surprising because the United States interests are generally aligned with false marking qui tam relators. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
The theory of the plaintiff (in a qui tam suit the proper nomenclature is "the relator") in United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:42 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:15 pm
Qui tam relators may have a difficult time in the future when relying upon stolen records or confidential patient information in False Claims Act (“FCA”) whistleblower actions after a recent decent by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:13 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm
Britton v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:04 am
The whistleblower filed a qui tam suit, United States, et al., ex rel. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
