Search for: "United States v. Union Corp." Results 181 - 200 of 888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 2:39 am
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20 (1991), the Court held that an individual employee could be compelled to arbitrate age discrimination claims, but it appeared as if a union was prohibited under Alexander v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
Trevi Icos Corp., just decided by the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island (but not yet up on its website), the court entered such an award against the losing plaintiff, a union provided employee benefit plan, on a claim brought by it under ERISA, even though the court acknowledged that ERISA’s fee shifting provisions are seldom used to require a losing plaintiff to pay attorney’s fees to a prevailing defendant. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
Hillary Clinton when she was running for president (Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:23 pm by Lee Tankle
On Monday, January 27, 2014, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a group of unionized steel workers at U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 This group includes individuals within the United States and many foreign countries. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:11 pm by Lee Tankle
He had previously been unable to procure sufficient support for his appointments from the United States Senate, which under the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The trustees (the Trustees) alleged that Reem Plumbing and Reem Contracting were contractually obligated to contribute to certain union benefit funds (the Funds), as required by four collective bargaining agreements between the Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York and Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada (id.). [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by PaulKostro
The United States Supreme Court held that, consistent with the First Amendment, a state could not “punish the truthful publication of an alleged juvenile delinquent’s name lawfully obtained by a newspaper. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:06 am by Amy Howe
United States, a Pennsylvania woman’s challenge to her conviction for violating federal laws prohibiting the use of chemical weapons. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:20 am
This decision is notable for its application of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) pleading standard, as clarified by the United States Supreme Court in BellAtlantic Corp. v. [read post]