Search for: "United States v. United Technologies Corp."
Results 181 - 200
of 1,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
(decided on February 17, 2009, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 08 Civ. 323(PKC)). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
As Wikipedia explains, “The United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:01 pm
United States, 141 Fed. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:50 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm
In Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
See Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
See Nader v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988), where a United States Marine helicopter copilot was killed when his CH-53D helicopter crashed off the coast of Virginia Beach and he drowned. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
The protection of intellectual property is at the forefront of agreements between nation-states because of the relative ease of copying, and the lax attitude of some nation-states to prevent and punish infringement.[2] A prevailing argument is the thesis that "technology drives investment" and to the extent that technology is reluctant to flow where it is not protected, the lack of an adequate level of protection could stunt… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Pregis Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 6:34 pm
Aldor Solutions Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
-The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear appeals in two separate lawsuits, Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
United Technologies Corp. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:25 am
In Ford v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm
§ 284 since its 1984 decision General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:14 am
Applying the twostep framework set forth in Alice Corp. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am
United States Plywood Corp., 318 F. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:42 pm
The United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Indiana held two bench trials, one on infringementand one on invalidity. [read post]
