Search for: "United Technologies Corp., in Re" Results 181 - 200 of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
Nicholas Weaver asked whether we’re facing the end of the FBI’s use of Network Investigative Techniques. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(IP Factor) Bar Ilan University holds premature ‘After Re Bilski’ conference (IP Factor)   Latin America Madrid protocol in Latin America: a nightmare or a dream? [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism (IAM) The… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers - 4/10/15. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  [W]hile technology available in other jurisdictions is relevant, legal standards in other jurisdictions are not. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
On July 31 the United States imposed sanctions under the Magnitsky Act against the XPCC and its senior officials for their connection to human rights abuse against ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:18 pm by mike
., 321 U.S. 275, 279 (1944)(simplicity of itself does not negate invention) Demaco Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:03 am by Ashby Jones
He sits on the boards of Procter & Gamble Co. and AMR Corp. in addition to Goldman, and he has served as special adviser on management reform to the United Nations secretary-general. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:02 pm
[T]he Respondents are about to engage in conduct prohibited by the EAR by re-exporting U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Tabb, 430 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1970) and In re Telular Corp., 319 F. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:23 pm by Dan Harris
Finding: The USITC determines (1) whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or (2) whether the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports that the Department of Commerce has determined to be sold in the United States at less than fair value or subsidized. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:27 pm by David Bilinsky
Some of the reported comments are quite critical of law schools: Chester Paul Beach, associate general counsel of United Technologies Corp., hammered home the need for more real-world training. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Microsoft Corp., No. 15-538 OIP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]