Search for: "Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
AVENTURA TENNIS, LLC, INC., Appellee. 3rd District.Injury LawAdams, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
This “person” won its challenge to a part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which required companies either to provide health care coverage that includes a full range of contraceptive choices, or to pay fines to the government. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
Kevin Elliott received his doctorate in the History and Philosophy of Science (Notre Dame), and he is currently an Associate Professor in Michigan State University. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm
As the Fourth Circuit put it in Liberty University, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
Paulson Jr. is the chairman of the Paulson Institute at the University of Chicago who served as secretary of the Treasury from July 2006 to January 2009. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The EEOC filed a complaint last week on behalf of three female employees against United Health Programs of America, Inc. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:00 am
The United States District Court held that the ordinance was a fee for the purposes of the TIA. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
United Airlines, Inc., 17 Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
In 2004, after several years of lobbying, agents of the litigation industry managed to push a policy statement past the Association’s leadership, to condemn the requirement of evidence-based reasoning in federal courts in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
In PTSI, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
Relying in part on the recent United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Clapper v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
The women who work for such churches thus are virtually the only women in the United States who will not be afforded this new national benefit, which I described in further detail in this post. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm
Commissioner (1989), relying on United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Gutierrez 13-347Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) (stating that an airport’s proposed interpretation of a speech-restricting policy would be unconstitutionally vague, even if an airport were to be treated as a nonpublic forum); International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
